























|
Criteria for assessing experts |
|
Equipment and facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisements in publications for the Legal profession |
|
Competence and the Council for the Registration of Forensic Practitioners |
|
Emerging from a recommendation of the 1993 Royal Commission on Criminal Justice, in a government-backed scheme under the auspices of Royal Society of Chemistry, a Register was established which promotes and maintains standards of competence, practice, discipline and ethics in the profession of Forensic Science. Now the task of selecting an Expert has become much simpler because registration automatically indicates that the expert has the appropriate background, sufficient experience and the necessary equipment to do the job. |
|
|
|
· |
It is a published register of competent forensic practitioners ensuring through four-yearly re-validation that they keep up to date and maintain competence |
|
· |
Currently it covers questioned documents, drugs, toxicology, marks, particulates and other traces, human contact traces, firearms and incident reconstruction. |
|
· |
Assessment is based on peer review and an assessment of recent work, journals, log books, appraisal results, portfolios, courses. |
|
|
|
Since March 2001 when it opened, 703 practitioners have qualified to be on the Register 33 of them Forensic Document Examiners. Now the Courts and the Legal profession have an independent and objective way of finding an appropriate and competent Expert |
